INKOVEMA Podcast „Well through time“

#75 – Negotiation mediation vs. agreement mediation

Is the Mediation Act a favourable basis for all mediators or the price for a common basis?

In conversation with Dr Jürgen von Oertzen and Dr Jörg Schneider-Brodtmann

Well through time. The podcast about mediation, conflict coaching and organisational consulting.

Dr Jürgen von Oertzen, Mediator and trainer, doctorate in political science, lives and works in Karlsruhe.

Dr Jörg Schneider-Brodtmannmediator and lawyer at Menold Bezler in Stuttgart. WirtschaftsWoche 34/2019 described the negotiation expert as one of the most renowned lawyers for IT law (co-author of the IT law commentary in the Verlag Dr Otto Schmidt KG), who for years has been advocating the advantages of mediation even in conflict-prone, complex contractual relationships

Contents:

Negotiation mediation vs agreement mediation?

  • Better vs. worse conflict management?
  • In-depth vs. superficial conflict mediation?
  • Functional vs. sustainable conflict resolution?
  • Business-to-business vs. heart-to-heart mediation?
  • Secured, enforceable agreements vs. trust-based agreements?
  • Court- and law-orientated vs. participant- and needs-orientated mediation?

The Mediation Act is to be distinguished from and

at the same time based on the civil process.

This leaves the idealised mediation

appear as negotiation mediation.

Left: